A rebuttal from Tribe

Laurence Tribe Preferred Faculty Photo, as of 3/3/14

In previous exchanges with my colleagues Jody Freeman and Richard Lazarus, I have explained why EPA’s Clean Power Plan lacks statutory authority and raises serious constitutional questions that would in fact eliminate any claim by EPA to deference for its revisionist reading of the Clean Air Act. In their most recent post, Freeman and Lazarus […]

Why EPA’s Climate Plan Is Unconstitutional

Laurence Tribe Preferred Faculty Photo, as of 3/3/14

When my friends Jody Freeman and Richard Lazarus defend the legality of the EPA’s power plant rule by saying that no one would take the constitutional arguments against the rule seriously were my “name not attached to them,” they no doubt mean to be complimentary. But I take my arguments very seriously indeed and hope, […]

Experts debate the constitutionality of the president’s climate change plan

Supreme-Court_istock (hi res)

Noted constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe ’66, Carl M. Loeb University Professor, has made headlines with his Congressional testimony that the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan is unconstitutional. Professors Jody Freeman LL.M. ’91 S.J.D. ’95 and Richard Lazarus ’79–two leading Harvard Law professors with expertise in environmental law, administrative law, and Supreme Court environmental litigation–take an opposing view.

Is the President’s Climate Plan Unconstitutional?

Freeman-Lazarus

Experts debate the constitutionality of the president’s climate change plan Noted constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe ’66 has made headlines with his Congressional testimony that the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan is unconstitutional. Testifying before the Energy and Power subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee on the EPA’s proposed rule for existing power […]

Supreme Court citing: Clinic students work on City of Los Angeles v. Patel

Supreme-Court Students

Last week, the nine justices of the Supreme Court peppered Tom Goldstein, veteran of 35 oral arguments before the Court and a cofounder of SCOTUSblog, with nearly 75 questions in 30 minutes – questions he was able to answer with the help of seven Harvard Law students who spent their January term working around the clock to research, write and edit the entire respondents’ brief in City of Los Angeles v. Patel.

Death penalty, in retreat: Interview with Professor Carol Steiker

Carol Steiker Preferred Faculty Photo, as of 3/3/14

HLS Professor Carol Steiker is using her year as the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study’s Rita E. Hauser Fellow to work with her brother and frequent collaborator, Jordan M. Steiker, on a book about the past half-century’s experiment with the constitutional regulation of capital punishment in America. She recently spoke with the Harvard Gazette about the history and future of the death penalty in the United States.